A retired police officer in Guilford, Connecticut, was found guilty of threatening a local high school teacher over her Pride hairstyle. In the CT Insider article, “Retired Guilford Cop Convicted of Threatening Local High School Over Educator's Pride Hairstyle,” writer Lisa Backus explains that the man, William Maisano, sent a threatening e-mail to the school principal on the day of the 2023 graduation, expressing his disapproval of the teacher’s display of support for the LGBTQ+ community. The teacher, a lesbian and president of the local teachers' union, had been wearing her hair in Pride colors and was the adviser to the school's Gender and Sexualities Alliance Club.
According to the article, Maisano's e-mail contained threatening language, stating that there would be "hell to pay" if the teacher’s "personal politics and sexual preferences" were "dragged into this event." The teacher felt unsafe and filed a complaint against Maisano, who had a history of opposing LGBTQ+ lifestyle and curriculum in schools.
Backus reports that the investigation concluded that Maisano's e-mail was indeed "ominous" and constituted a threat. He was arrested and subsequently convicted of Second-Degree Breach of Peace and Second-degree Threatening.
Teachers, like all individuals, have the right to express their identity and political affiliations within the bounds of professionalism. This right is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. But teachers face the challenge of balancing their personal beliefs with their ability to provide a neutral and inclusive learning environment for all students.
There may be concern among some parents and students that teachers expressing their identity or political affiliations could lead to biased treatment or discrimination in the classroom. When it comes to controversial social issues, some parents may worry that teachers are using their authority to promote their own ideologies, potentially influencing students without parental consent. While few parents would resort to threats, some might privately believe that teachers should focus solely on academics and that personal expressions can be a distraction from the learning environment.
Ultimately, what protection do we owe to teachers who choose to express their identity or their politics? And is there a limit to what they should express?